
"Feminization as devalorization" is a phrase that indicates a situation, structure, or value system where the female and things associated with femininity are deemed lesser than males and masculine-identified things. Thus gaining or losing feminine status also determines a respective gain or loss of power, opportunity, respect, etc. Pertaining to much of what we've covered this semester, this idea permeates our culture in ways we may not realize. Oftentimes, to prove the point, professors will have students list off adjectives to describe men and women, and wouldn't you know, the female adjectives are typically less desirable.
Yet many conflate the notion of feminization as devalorization with what is "natural" or "the truth".
Culturally condescended into believing that parts or wholes of women were less.
As a kid I wasn't ever able to get over how women couldn't just "act like boys" to make their goals happen. And I never really ran into it until this class. We talked about Erauso and de Cespedes, where one used masculinity as a means of escaping out of the convent and the other to match her testicles. But the case of the Albanian women is different as their "sworn virginity" is usually due to economic circumstances. Men serve roles as providers and have much more freedom to travel, negotiate, learn skills, etc. If a family doesn't have a male heir, this is a potential decision that can save a family from dying destitute.
For me, this really calls into question the notion of gender role rigidity. If women can swear to not disturb sexual/orietentation roles, they are allowed to become men. Yet the idea that women should not have the freedoms and opportunities that men do isn't even brought up in the conversation. There would be no such virgins if these inequalities were addressed.
Would the situation be different if there were more/better social services in place?
http://video.nationalgeographic.com/video/player/places/culture-places/beliefs-and-traditions/albania_swornvirgins.html